Robes de Coeur
  • Blog
  • Quilting
  • Clothing
    • Menswear
    • Womenswear >
      • Self-Made Patterns
      • Commercial Patterns
    • Hats
    • Miscellany
  • About
  • Blog
  • Quilting
  • Clothing
    • Menswear
    • Womenswear >
      • Self-Made Patterns
      • Commercial Patterns
    • Hats
    • Miscellany
  • About

Blackwork Ruffle

2/12/2018

3 Comments

 
My first essay into my Elizabethan-inspired ensemble is a blackwork ruffle, mainly because a ruffle can be used anywhere, so I could make it even when I didn't have any clothing patterns.  It seemed a good way to get started on the project and see how I liked blackwork. 
To start with, I searched for pattern inspiration.  I don't want to exactly copy a period piece, since this outfit is for me, not for history; I want to embroider things I like.  So I searched first for stylized images of swallows or other birds, but found nothing that looked Elizabethan.  Swallows and birds are just too curvy for blackwork, I guess.  I tried to draw my own, but I'm not very good at drawing, and even worse at abstracting things.  So I decided on flowers, instead.  My first effort was substantially copied from Paula Katherine Marmor's patterns, which she put up for "personal and educational use".  (I love people who share their work!)  I took the daffodil and improvised a sun. 
Picture

Then I transferred the diagonal lines to my ruffle fabric to give myself a guide.  But once I'd done that, I realized that while I did make my intervals one inch (as I'd planned), I hadn't thought about the height, and the spaces I wound up with were too tall and skinny for the daffodils! 
Picture
Then I drew a few of my own flowers, which look less historical than hers; the biggest difference is that the historical patterns (or Marmor's modern ones) have a pixelated look, since they're drawn and meant to be sewn on a grid.  Mine are curvier, because I can't seem to get the hang of the grid, and my fabric is a fine weave, so it doesn't enforce a grid.  I sewed six flowers thus derived:
Picture
From left to right we have a snowdrop, an iris, a sun (can't have flowers without sun, right?), a daffodil, eyebright, a top-view of mint (the triangley one), and a gillyflower.  The daffodil and gillyflower are Marmor's, the rest mine.  Liking the look of this ruffly botanical so much, I searched for "Tudor botanical" online and found The Tudor Pattern Book on BiblioOdyssey.  Many pages have one or two flowers drawn realistically at the top, and underneath a stylized flower that looks sort of like the love-child of the upper two flowers, as drawn by Dr. Seuss.  Quintessential Tudor style!  It's a good source of inspiration.  Another, more personal, source is my sketchbook from years ago when I lived in Northern Minnesota.  I drew flowers as a way of studying them:
Picture
Picture
Picture
Picture
This portrait of Mary I of England, (the famous Bloody Mary) shows a collar much like the botanical one I made.  (Mary is seen wearing this same or a very similar collar in a 1554 portrait by Antonis Mor, but the blackwork details are clearer in this one.)  Below is my ruffle with box pleats pinned:
Picture
Picture
Painting of Mary I of England, artist unknown. Public Domain, via Wikimedia Commons.
For those wondering about materials used, I tore a strip of cotton sheeting for the ruffle, and used all-purpose thread for the embroidery.  As yet, I have no use for the ruffle, but I'm sure I'll be able to put it somewhere.  And if not, it was still been educational and fun to do!  Turns out I do enjoy blackwork embroidery.  Good to know! 

HISTORICAL ACCURACY?

My materials are not historically accurate.  I'm pretty sure the white fabric in period would have been linen, and I don't know what fibers they embroidered with.  My method of transferring patterns (draw lightly with a pencil and then trace over it with filled running stitch or "Holbein stitch") is doubtful.  Did they have pencils back then?  Did they draw the patterns on the fabric or go by eye?  I don't know.  My patterns themselves are not historical.  And I'm not using any of the counted stitch fill patterns so typical of the Spanish/Moorish aesthetic.  Yet the look is close to the look of the blackwork in portraits, if less adeptly done.  It's a start! 
3 Comments
The Sister
2/13/2018 11:19:10 am

I always wonder how accurate the portraits are to the likeness of the poser. With so many portraiture artists from the times, we get a bunch of different ideas of what the monarch actually looked like in real life. Perhaps each painter saw a different side of their sitter?

Queen Mary's collar is a lovely contrast to the somber black of her gown. Can't wait to see what you do with yours!

Reply
Karen Roy link
2/13/2018 01:20:28 pm

With Queen Elizabeth I, the portraits were definitely not accurate, especially as she aged. They were carefully crafted political statements which sent several consistent messages:

The Queen is a Tudor (red hair, Tudor roses)
The Queen is a Virgin (capital V, replacement for the Virgin Mary in a newly Protestant country)
The Queen is eternal (definitely not aging, definitely not going to die childless and leave the country without a successor!)
The Queen is splendid and rich (adore her!)

She was following in her father's footsteps: his portraiture was iconic rather than realistic: the image of the king as wide, manly, square-faced and enormously cod-pieced was consistent throughout his reign, even when in reality he was fat, crippled, and gray. If you've got Amazon Prime, check out their video called Holbein: Eye of the Tudors for a look at role of the portrait artist.

Reply
The Sister
2/19/2018 05:53:41 pm

Your comments make me crack up. (Even "Vogue to Wasserman: 'This is what you'd look like if you were good enough for us!'" #thatllleaveamark Ouch!)

Also, how interesting! And Holbein is the name of a high-quality artists' gouache company (and probably other artists' tools and materials. I wonder if there is a correlation...?




Leave a Reply.

    Karen Roy

    Quilting, dressmaking, and history plied with the needle...

    Categories

    All
    1910's
    Alteration
    Antique
    Dyeing
    Embroidery
    General
    Hand Sewing
    History
    Lacemaking
    Mending
    Menswear
    Millinery
    Modern Elizabethan
    Musing
    Other Sewing
    Philippians 4:8
    Project Diary
    Quilting
    Regency
    Retro
    Self Made Pattern
    Self-made Pattern
    Terminology
    Victorian
    Vintage

    Blogs I Read

    The Dreamstress
    Male Pattern Boldness
    ​
    Lilacs & Lace
    Tom of Holland
    Fit for a Queen
    Line of Selvage
    Mainely Menswear
    Bernadette Banner

    Archives

    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    August 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017

    RSS Feed

Blog

Quilting

Clothing

About

Copyright Karen Roy
​© 2017-2022